Monday, 4 November 2013

Critical Reflection - The Essay Process (Edited)

I feel that I have made gradual improvements as I proceed through this course. The course had improved my academic writing to a large extent in terms of grammar.

Writing the problem-solution essay was no easy feat as I am more aware of my mistakes and hence, have learnt to be more careful during the writing process. In the past, my essays often consisted of mainly grammar mistakes and through this course, I realised that it was due to the common use of ‘Singlish’. For instance, the use of ‘would’ is often abused by Singaporeans during writing and I am guilty of such errors.

I believe that this course had amended some of my habitual mistakes and raised the standards of my academic writings in the university. However, there is a need to improve on my vocabulary as I face difficulty in expressing myself and often find repetition in the use of words.


My next phase of learning will consist of reading more academic journals in order to improve my vocabulary and sentence structure.

Sunday, 3 November 2013

Final Problem-Solution Essay

The Impact of Globalisation on Singapore's Culture

By Joan Tan

Over the last century, the world has enjoyed the convenience globalisation has provided in terms of transportation, communication and tremendous economic growth through trade. Despite the numerous benefits that globalisation has brought, there are some drawbacks to this worldwide phenomenon. One of which is the loss of localized culture and this causes cities to become increasingly similar to one another. Also, economic growth is of more importance as compared to culture and heritage and the loss of such culture is, unfortunately, permanent.

However, it is fortunate that governments have begun to realise the need to preserve the culture and heritage of a nation and to build a national identity with such local culture. For instance, in Singapore, national education has been introduced in the curriculums of the youths studying in primary and secondary schools. The increase in the efforts towards conservation and preservation of monuments and cultural districts has also successfully slowed down the erosion of culture in Singapore. The report will be evaluating the efforts by government institutions on the preservation of culture and heritage in Singapore and suggest alternatives to improve the situation.

First and foremost, the preservation of culture is necessary as such national education exists to fulfil the purpose of educating Singaporeans to embrace their own culture and hence, create a national identity. Some features of national education include learning how to appreciate the peace Singapore enjoys from racial harmony and the uniqueness of the various cultures and how they have evolved to become part of the Singapore culture. Educating youth on their history and the nation’s sufferings in order to achieve the economic growth and standards of living Singaporeans enjoy today helps build a national identity as it reflects something common amongst all citizens. It creates a sense of belonging and allows Singaporeans to feel attached to their homeland (Ministry of Education, 2013). However, national education has its limits and this is especially so for “global citizens”. As globalization has promoted the free movement of people and goods, we often find that one is never a “pure” Singaporean. The mix of various nationalities makes it difficult to enforce national education. In fact, it is nearly impossible to create a national identity amongst such global citizens with their vast background differences.

Therefore, instead of focusing on enforcing propaganda on children today, national education should be focusing on allowing children to enjoy the freedom of speech and to encourage them to play their part as Singaporeans in terms of environmental conservation, providing platforms for them to participate in the local political scene and to encourage active community engagement. By encouraging the young to participate actively in nation building, they may feel inclined to remain and help the country prosper due to the obligation to protect the country they have helped shape. Although there may be downsides to this proposal, it certainly helps in creating the identity Singapore urgently needs, an identity where citizens are all engaged in deciding the future of their country. It is more important to look forward and create an identity that cannot be erased simply by the fact that global citizens have not been through the era of “suffering”. Educating the young on the past is simply not enough.

Furthermore, the government is actively seeking to preserve national monuments for cultural and heritage purposes. According to the National Heritage Board (2013), the preservation of monuments and significant sites in Singapore has been on-going since 1971 when the Preservation of Monuments Board was set up. The board has since been merged with the National Heritage Board and is responsible for researching possible preservation sites and to provide the support to maintain and restore such sites. They are also responsible for creating awareness amongst the public and act as an advisor to businesses and the government.

Despite the urgent need for the preservation of national sites, there have been numerous occasions where such sites have conflicting interests with the modern economy. For example, Bukit Brown, which was featured on the “World Monument Watch 2014” has become the newest victim of the land transportation development in Singapore. Part of the Bukit Brown cemetery will be converted to roads that will help improve the congestion during peak hours (Urban Redevelopment Authority, 2012). Land scarcity in Singapore has resulted in the inevitable loss of cultural and heritage sites due to the need to cater to the rising population and growth of Singapore’s economy.

Therefore, there is a need to strike a balance between the use of land for urban development and the preservation efforts of cultural sites. One way that could provide the balance is to promote restoration rather than preservation. Restoration may seem to be a cure rather than a preventive measure. However, cultural and heritage sites that were forced to give way to urban development could incorporate elements of buildings or monuments that were once part of the area. Developers could be made to install certain facilities such as museums in the present office buildings or even work with the exterior of the buildings to preserve the elements of culture and heritage. For example, developers could retain traditional Chinese rooftop designs on newly developed skyscrapers in Chinatown to give an idea that the heritage site used to be located in that particular area.

In conclusion, the loss of culture caused by globalisation has resulted in a lack of sense of belonging among young Singaporeans. However, present efforts such as national education and the preservation of cultural sites and monuments are insufficient to prevent the rapid loss of local culture. Therefore, there is an urgent need to cultivate an emotional attachment among the youth in Singapore and the most efficient way would be to allow them to participate in the country's policy making process and to actively encourage environmental conservation and community engagement. The inevitable loss of national sites due to land scarcity should be reinforced by restoration rather than simply preserving rundown and old buildings which serves little purposes. By adopting such methods, the pressing need to integrate global citizens and to create a unique culture can be alleviated.

References
Ministry of Education. (2013). National Education. Retrieved from   http://www.ne.edu.sg/
National Heritage Board. (2013). About Preservation of Sites & Monuments. Retrieved from       
http://goo.gl/CsuhPO
Urban Redevelopment Authority (2012). News Releases. Retrieved from       http://www.ura.gov.sg/pr/text/2012/pr12-26.html


Thursday, 17 October 2013

ES1102 - Problem Solving Essay

The Impact of Globalisation on Singapore's Culture

1.       Introduction

Over the last century, the world has enjoyed the convenience globalisation have provided in terms of transportation, communication and tremendous economic growth through trade. Despite the numerous benefits that globalisation has brought, there are some drawbacks to this worldwide phenomenon. One of which is the loss of localized culture and this causes cities to become increasingly similar to one another. Economic growth has dominated over the importance of culture and heritage and the loss of such culture is, unfortunately, permanent.

However, it is fortunate that governments have begun to realise the need to preserve the culture and heritage of a nation and to build a national identity with such local culture. For instance, in Singapore, national education has been introduced in the curriculum of the youths studying in primary and secondary schools. The increase in efforts towards conservation and preservation of monuments and cultural districts has also successfully slow down the erosion of culture in Singapore.

The negative impacts that globalization has on local culture and heritage has been evident through the desperate need to preserve and promote local culture. The report will be evaluating the efforts by government institutes on the preservation of culture and heritage in Singapore and suggest new methods to improve the situation.

      2.       Preserving Culture and Creating a National Identity

The preservation of culture is necessary to create a national identity. With the increase in number of skyscrapers and tourist attractions being built around the world, it has become an increasingly challenge to differentiate between cities. For example, cities like Shanghai, Singapore and London share a common feature of an observatory wheel. Although each has its own unique name, they serve the same purpose as a viewing gallery. However, what differentiate the observatory wheels are not the technology or the architects but rather the view on the highest point of the wheels. The scenery that surrounds the wheel should not be merely office buildings but rather something that speaks more about the nation and its stories.

National education exists for the sole purpose of educating Singaporeans to embrace their own culture and to create a national identity. Some features of national education includes learning how to appreciate the peace Singapore enjoys from racial harmony, the uniqueness of the various cultures and how they have evolve to become part of the Singapore culture. Educating the young on the history of Singapore and the nation’s suffering to achieve the economic growth and standard of living Singaporeans enjoy today helps build a national identity for Singaporeans as it reflects something common amongst all Singaporeans. It creates a sense of belonging and allows Singaporeans to feel attached to their homeland (Ministry of Education, 2013). However, national education has its limits and this is especially so for “global citizens”. As globalization has promoted the free movement of people and goods, we often find that one is never a “pure” Singaporean. The mix of various nationalities makes it difficult to enforce national education. In fact, it is nearly impossible to create a national identity amongst such global citizens with their vast background differences.

Instead of focusing on inducing propaganda on children today, national education should be focusing on allowing children to express freely and to encourage them to do their part in terms of environmental conservation in Singapore, providing platforms for them to participate in the local political scene and to encourage active community engagement. By encouraging the young to participate actively in nation building, they would feel inclined to stay on and help the country prosper as they feel obligated to protect the country they have helped shape. Although there may be downsides to this proposal, it certainly helps in creating the identity Singapore needs. An identity where Singaporeans are all engaged in deciding the future of their country. This is new and challenging as compared to simply educating children today of the past which may not appeal to them at all. It is more important to look forward and create an identity that cannot be erased simply by the fact that global citizens have not been through the era of “suffering”.

      3.       Preservation and Conservation Efforts

According to the National Heritage Board (2013), the preservation of monuments and significant sites in Singapore has been on-going since 1971 when the Preservation of Monuments Board was set up. The board has since been merged with the National Heritage Board and is responsible for researching on possible preservation sites, providing the support to maintenance and restoration to such sites. They are also responsible for creating awareness amongst the public and act as an advisor to businesses and the government.

Despite the urgent need for the preservation of national sites, there have been numerous occasions where national heritage sites have conflicting interests with the modern economy. For example, Bukit Brown, which was featured on the “World Monument Watch 2014” and has become the newest victim to the development of land transportation in Singapore. Part of the Bukit Brown cemetery will be converted to roads that will help improve the congestion along Pan-Island Expressway and Lornie Road during peak hours (Urban Redevelopment Authority, 2012). Land scarcity in Singapore has resulted in the inevitable loss of cultural and heritage sites given the need to cater to the rising population and growth of Singapore’s economy.

Therefore, there is a need to strike a balance between the use of land for urban development and the preservation efforts of cultural sites. One way that could provide the balance is to promote restoration rather than preservation. Restoration may seem to be a cure rather than a preventing measure. However, cultural and heritage sites that were forced to give way to urban development could incorporate elements of buildings or monuments that were once part of the area. Developers could be made to install certain facilities such as museums in the present office buildings or even work with the exterior of the buildings to preserve the elements of culture and heritage. For example, developers could retain traditional Chinese rooftop designs on newly developed skyscrapers in Chinatown. This would help give an idea of the particular heritage site and where they used to be located.

      4.       Conclusion

The loss of culture caused by globalisation has resulted in the lacking of belongingness among young Singaporeans. However, present efforts such as national education and the preservation of cultural sites and monuments are insufficient to prevent the rapid loss of local culture. Therefore, there is an urgent need to cultivate an emotional attachment among the youth in Singapore and the most efficient way would be to allow them to participate in the decision-making process on the country’s policies and to actively encourage environmental conservation and community engagement. The inevitable loss of national sites due to land scarcity should be reinforced by restoration rather than simply preserving rundown and old buildings which serve little purposes. By adopting such methods, the pressing need to integrate global citizens and to create a unique culture can then be alleviated.


References
Ministry of Education. (2013). National Education. Retrieved from   http://www.ne.edu.sg/
National Heritage Board. (2013). About Preservation of Sites & Monuments. Retrieved from                      http://goo.gl/CsuhPO
Urban Redevelopment Authority (2012). News Releases. Retrieved from                                                  http://www.ura.gov.sg/pr/text/2012/pr12-26.html


Sunday, 22 September 2013

Submission of Summary "Runaway Globalization Without Governance" by Mr. Nayan Chandra

Task 1: Summary (5%)

Article: "Runaway Globalization Without Governance" by Mr. Nayan Chandra


Summary of the article:

"Globalization may bring adverse impacts to the world as governance fails to catch up with the pace of globalization. Globalization is the process where communities become inter-connected with one another. As various states establish their own set of laws to rule over their people and utilize scarce resources, it is difficult to come to a consensus on an internationally recognized set of laws which will not affect their interests. An example would be the need to govern intellectual property rights.

Furthermore, the existence of expanding empires is helpful in regulating globalization but results in other problems that require more rules to be enforced. International coordination is needed to address the issues that arise from the growth in the communications and transportation sectors as regulation lags far behind. International regulation will only work if conflicts of interests do not exist. When sovereignty and national security are at stake, negotiations for global governance become difficult and this is the challenge at hand. However, the United States, a key player in international governance, is not assuming an active role in promoting global governance and this may in turn put the world at greater risk."

Cheers,

Joan

Saturday, 21 September 2013

Reader's Response to "Runaway Globalization Without Governance" by Nayan Chanda


Reader’s Response to “Runaway Globalization Without Governance” by Nayan Chanda

In Chanda’s article, “Runaway Globalization Without Governance”, the key ideas presented by the author are effective in presenting the adverse impacts globalization may bring to the world if governance fails to catch up with the pace of globalization. Chanda explained the benefits the world has reaped from globalization and the seriousness in the lack of governance in a globalized world. The main ideas presented raised a few political issues brought about by globalization and generally, the issues were well-presented and organized.

When Chanda wrote about the greatest challenges to a globalized world, he mentioned “the lack of global governance had emerged as the single most daunting challenge to globalization”. This would be the shared sentiment of many world leaders as border and national security issues are prioritized over global coordination. Countries are unwilling to work with one another if there is a risk of compromising their sovereignty. This is natural to world leaders as they would have to protect their country’s interests. The threats brought about by a lack of global governance will never overpower the need for their country to remain independent.

This situation is well demonstrated by one of the most influential countries in the world, the United States of America, has withdrawn from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and is focusing on the development of new weaponry instead of setting a leading example to disarm. Despite the call for disarmament, Chandra observes that the world has moved in the “opposite direction”. This is largely due to the fact that the government sees the oppressing need to protect the countries from external threats as other nations continue the development of nuclear weapons. One would be at risk if they do not keep up with the pace to develop their military capabilities. 



The views by Chanda demonstrate the dilemma that world leaders face today. It is clear that world leaders have acknowledged the increasing need for the presence of global governance today. However, national security and sovereignty is their first priority. The article offers a balanced view to the present situation in the world and the difficulties to global governance. The author is highly recommended to researchers who wish to gain more exposure to the issues brought about by globalization due to his insights on the matter.

Wednesday, 11 September 2013

Final Draft - Runaway Globalization Without Governance by Nayan Chandra

Task 1: Summary (5%)

Final draft of the article named "Runaway Globalization Without Governance" by Mr. Nayan Chandra

Summary of the article:

"Globalization may bring adverse impacts in the world as governance fails to catch up with the pace of globalization. Globalization is the process where communities become inter-connected with one another. As various states establish their own set of governing rules to rule over their people and utilize scarce resources, it is difficult to come to a consensus on an internationally recognized set of laws which will not affect their interests. An example would be the need to govern over intellectual property rights.

Furthermore, the existence of expanding empires is helpful to regulation but results in other problems which requires more rules to be enforced. International coordination is needed to address the issues that arise from the growth in the communications and transportation sectors as regulation lags far behind. International regulation will only work if conflicts of interests do not exist. When sovereignty and national security are at stake, negotiations for global governance become difficult and this is the challenge at hand. However, the United States, a key player in international governance, is not taking up an active role to promote global governance and this may in turn put the world at greater risk."

Check out this link for the article http://www.fairplanet.ca/media/globalization.pdf.

Cheers,

Joan (:

Nayan Chanda is director of publications at the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization and editor of YaleGlobal Online. His most recent book is Bound Together: How Traders, Preachers, Adventurers and Warriors Shaped Globalization (2007). 1. Quoted in G. J. Resink, Indonesia’s History Between the Myths: Essays in Legal History and Historical Theory (The Hague: W. van Hoeve Publishers Ltd.,
1968), p. 45; from F. W. Stapel, Het Bongaais verdrag: De vestiging der Nederlanders op Makassar(The Bonggaya Treaty: The Establishment of the Dutch in Makassar), PhD diss., University of Leiden, 1922, p. 14 and note 2.

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Runaway Globalization Without Governance by Mr. Nayan Chandra

Task 1: Summary (5%)

First draft of the article named "Runaway Globalization Without Governance" by Mr. Nayan Chandra

Summary of the article:

"Globalization may bring adverse impacts on in the world as governance fails to catch up with the pace of globalization. Globalization is the process where communities become inter-connected with one another. As various states establish their own set of governing rules to rule over its their people and utilize scarce resources, it is difficult to come to a consensus on an internationally recognized set of laws which will not affect their interests. An example will be would be the need to govern over intellectual property rights.


Furthermore, the existence of expanding empires is helpful to regulation but resulted result in other problems which required requires more rules to be enforced. International coordination is needed to address the issues that arise from the growth in the communications and transportation sectors as regulation lags far behind. International regulation will only work if there are no conflicts of interests do not exist. When sovereignty and national security are at stake, negotiations for global governance become difficult and this is the challenge at hand. However, the United States, a key player in international governance, is not taking up an active role to promote global governance and this may in turn put the world at greater risk."

Check out this link for the article http://www.fairplanet.ca/media/globalization.pdf.

Cheers,

Joan (:

Nayan Chanda is director of publications at the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization and editor of YaleGlobal Online. His most recent book is Bound Together: How Traders, Preachers, Adventurers and Warriors Shaped Globalization (2007). 1. Quoted in G. J. Resink, Indonesia’s History Between the Myths: Essays in Legal History and Historical Theory (The Hague: W. van Hoeve Publishers Ltd.,
1968), p. 45; from F. W. Stapel, Het Bongaais verdrag: De vestiging der Nederlanders op Makassar(The Bonggaya Treaty: The Establishment of the Dutch in Makassar), PhD diss., University of Leiden, 1922, p. 14 and note 2.